PreviousNext
Page 46
Previous/Next Page
Witness to the History of Australian MedicineWitness to the History of Australian Medicine
----------
Table of Contents

The development of microvascular surgery in Australia

Introduction

Participants

Beginnings

Developing links with academia and hospital medicine

A bevy of supporters

An ever-widening circle of contributors

Building research capacity

Nurturing relationships

Raising funds for research and development

The microsurgeon and the law

Winning community and corporate support

Leadership

The Institute and its style

Endnotes

Index
Search
Help

Contact us
Developing links with academia and hospital medicine (continued)

Now those facilities were also built and partly financed through the Australian Universities Commission (AUC) and partly staffed. Well, the AUC grant was one that I promoted – the hospital gave money, the Hospitals and Charities Commission gave money – so the original research theatres were then established and my Department was then able to provide one technician to help run the theatres. And Mrs Williams[40] here was the first lady who ran it. She was the Director of that. We used to do regular theatre inspections and report to various people. And so there was an overseeing role of the Microsurgery Research Advisory Committee of the facilities and the personnel and the actual projects being conducted. I can't quite remember when that finished but clearly it moved on to the establishment of an independent institute, still backed by the Foundation, and the research funding now coming from other sources.

Ann Westmore: During this transition period when Bernard was moving from being under a Department to more of a Hospital relationship, how was this resolved between you and the Hospital?

Dick Bennett: There were still funds in the University Department books and I was also a member of the Microsurgery Research Advisory Committee. And, with Dr Keane, the Medical Superintendent, all money if it had to go through Hospital channels, he or the Sister Administrator or CEO gave approval.[41] The transition period wasn't all that difficult. I was on both committees, and when the funds in the Department had been fully utilised the project was entirely Hospital-based and then the responsibility of the Hospital finance officer and CEO. They also had some difficult times keeping up with Bernard’s grants and overseas trainees! I wonder if Bryan [Egan] would like to say if I’ve got all that right. It’s a long time ago and it involves things which I think are important and I wouldn’t like to be taken out of context.

Bryan Egan: I think Dick Bennett exaggerates my knowledge and skills. In fact there was very little [relevant] archival material; I couldn't find very much at all. I’m speaking of those years, for instance, where I think Joan would be able to fill in a few gaps. To me, in retrospect, Bernard O’Brien was, for so many years, the man who wasn’t there. Looking backwards, why wasn’t he there? What was going on? How did he come back? I know some of the reasons why he came back. But I can’t fault Dick Bennett’s evocation of those years in retrospect. I don’t think there is any paper surviving which will clarify it. Barbara Cytowicz[42] has some papers from those years which are certainly relevant to Bernard, but not so much to microsurgery. It even seems to me, while listening to Dick, there might have been a Microsurgery Research Unit in another hospital in Melbourne from which Bernard O’Brien might have driven forward the events which have happened at this hospital.

Dick Bennett: As it happens I still have quite a substantial file with many papers relating to activities and events during these years, which I have reviewed in advance of this meeting.

Bryan Egan: It's wonderful for St Vincent’s that it happened the way it did. But I’ve always wondered, or certainly when I was listening to Dick I’ve wondered, what would have happened if Maurice Ewing, for instance, had taken up Bernard O’Brien. Well, personal relationships over at the Royal Melbourne Hospital may have got in the way there, probably did, I think not between Maurice Ewing and Bernard O’Brien, but there were other people involved at the Royal Melbourne which, fortunately for St Vincent’s, would have probably been a sort of frosty wind.


Previous Page Witness to the History of Australian Medicine Next Page


© The University of Melbourne 2005-16
Published by eScholarship Research Centre, using the Web Academic Resource Publisher
http://witness.esrc.unimelb.edu.au/046.html