PreviousNext
Page 138
Previous/Next Page
Witness to the History of Australian MedicineWitness to the History of Australian Medicine
----------
Table of Contents

Tobacco Control: Australia's Role

Transcript of Witness Seminar

Introduction

Building the case for tobacco control

Producing, and Responding to, the Evidence

Campaigning for Tobacco Control

Economic Initiatives in Tobacco Control

The Radical Wing of Tobacco Control

Revolutionary Road

Tobacco Industry Strategies and Responses to Them

Campaign Evaluation

Managing Difficulties in Light of Community Consensus

Radical Wing Again

The Process of Political Change

Tobacco Campaigns Up Close

A Speedier Pace of Change

Political Needs and Campaign Strategies

Litigation and its Impacts

Insights from Tobacco Control

Tobacco Control in Australia in International Perspective

Appendix 1: Statement by Anne Jones

Endnotes

Index
Search
Help

Contact us
Revolutionary Road (continued)

Mike Daube: I’d like to add a couple of things. Someone mentioned Fred Daly in 1972. I remember in the UK in ‘73, the science editor of the British newspaper, The Sun, said to me, ‘You will never find anything new to say about smoking.’ One of things that everyone here can take credit for is that we’re always finding new things to say and new ways to present it. The creativity of people working in tobacco over the years has contributed to that.

The second point I want to make is about having five minutes with a politician. Thinking back to WA, a colleague who can’t be here, Maurice Swanson,[69] was a young public servant working with the WA Health Department. Back in the early ‘80s he went to see the then opposition health spokesperson, Barry Hodge,[70] and talked with him about prevention and tobacco. And Barry got interested in that.

And when the Burke government was elected, Barry became the Health Minister. He was a very strong supporter of tobacco control and in an early Cabinet meeting he insisted on action against tobacco or he would resign. That was a very gutsy thing to do in the early days of a new government.

Very shortly after that the WA government put $2 million, then a further amount of money, into the first major state Quit Campaign. There had been 'Quit for Life' in NSW, but not consistent, substantial funding for a state campaign. And that comes back to having the money for strong media campaigns with strong ads on television that paved the way for public support.

Legislation for WA, like the VicHealth legislation, followed.

Thinking back to the 1980s, and the interaction between the states, I remember sitting on the side benches during the Drug Summit. It had been called by the then Prime Minister Bob Hawke,[71] because of concern about heroin. Premiers Bjelke -Petersen and Wran[72] were very strong on heroin.

Other premiers said, ‘Hang on, this is not just about heroin. It’s about other issues as well.’ They ensured that tobacco, and to a lesser extent alcohol, were seen as part of a national approach. Again, it’s the impact of some jurisdictions on others and what can be learned from that.

Kate Joel:[73] I want to pick up on the importance of having a longer-term strategy, which touches on a number of things others have said. Tom used the word constancy.

It all started to come together in the mid-1980s when WA raised that excise on tobacco and raised an extra $26 million that went into the state coffers each year. But what was really significant was that the WA Government committed to funding over a three year period. It was really the first time in the history of health education, not just tobacco, that there was a campaign over three years. That enabled a campaign that started with two years of really solid research before a public awareness campaign was started.

Four former directors of Quit Victoria.

Figure 2

Four former directors of Quit Victoria, L-R: Todd Harper, Michelle Scollo, Dorothy Reading, Kate Joel (McAllister), 29 May 2015, Carlton, Vic. Image courtesy of VicHealth.

I was obviously involved in that in WA before bringing that model with me to Victoria to start the Quit Campaign here in 1985. That was a tripartite initiative between the State Government, the Cancer Council and the Heart Foundation. Again that was a long term strategy. You then had the benefit of three years solid research behind the WA campaign.

And that model was employed successfully. We really used the same model for a whole range of health areas, including food and nutrition, and AIDS. So it is about having a longer term strategy. Up to that point there had been various initiatives that had been successful in their own way but they’d all been short term. And we can look at various initiatives in the health arena. It’s all about keeping ahead of the curve. You might think the job is done but then you have developments like e-cigarettes that start to normalise that sort of behaviour again.


Previous Page Witness to the History of Australian Medicine Next Page


© The University of Melbourne 2005-16
Published by eScholarship Research Centre, using the Web Academic Resource Publisher
http://witness.esrc.unimelb.edu.au/138.html